In the post
I put yesterday on my blog I argued that Socrates’ distancing himself in the Apology from ‘a Socrates’ (Sȏkratȇ tina) whom the Athenians saw in
the comedy of Aristophanes should not prevent us from enjoying his caricature in The Clouds. More can be said about the points I made there.
In The Clouds 193-4 a would be disciple of
Socrates, Strepsiades, asks, pointing at Socrates’ disciples he can see at the
forecourt of Socrates’ ‘Thinkery’: ‘But why is their anus looking into the
heaven?’ The disciple accompanying him replies: ‘It itself on itself (autos kath’ hauton) learns to do
astronomy (astronomein didasketai).’ Yesterday I observed: ‘Note the phrase autos kath’ hauton; Aristophanes appears
to make fun of the expression with which Socrates in Plato’s dialogues
characterizes the Forms. See e.g. Plato’s Symposium
where Diotima introduces the young Socrates to the notion of the Beauty auto kath’ hauto ‘itself in itself’ (211b1).’
Most of the
past year I was preoccupied with arguing that Plato’s insistence on the
historicity of the discussion between a very young Socrates, Zeno, and a very
old Parmenides, which he enacted in his
Parmenides, ought to be taken seriously. (See ‘Plato’s defence of the Forms
in the Parmenides’ on my website.)
In the
dialogue, Socrates asks Zeno: ‘Do you not acknowledge that there exists (ou nomizeis einai) itself in itself (auto kath’ hauto) some Form of
similarity (eidos ti homoiotȇtos)?’ (128e6-129a1)
With this question the young Socrates introduces his theory of Forms in the Parmenides; Parmenides subjects it to
criticism, yet insists that if anyone rejects the Forms, ‘not allowing the Form
of each thing to be always the same’ (mȇ
eȏn idean tȏn ontȏn hekastou tȇn
autȇn aei einai), ‘he will thus utterly destroy the power of philosophic
discussion’ (houtȏs tȇn tou dialegesthai
dunamin pantapasi diaphtherei, 135c2-3).
In The Clouds Socrates’ Deity, the Clouds,
which form the Chorus, enter the stage with the words: ‘Shaking off the rainy
cloud (aposeisamenai nephos ombrion) from
immortal Form (athanatas ideas), let us view (epidȏmetha) the earth with a far-reaching eye (tȇleskopȏi ommati gaian). (286-290).’
What can the
‘immortal Form’ of the Deity possibly be? The Clouds enter the scene as
‘maidens carrying rain’ (parthenoi
ombrophoroi, 299). Strepsiades asks: ‘What happened to them (ti pathousai), if they are truly clouds
(eiper nephelai g’ eisin alȇthȏs),
that they look like mortal women (thnȇtais
eiksasi gunaixin, 340-1)?’ Socrates answers: ‘They become everything they
want to’ (gignontai panth’ hoti bulontai,
349). Thus on seeing a man who is stealing from public property: ‘showing his
nature (apophainousai tȇn phusin autou),
they suddenly became wolves (lukoi
exaiphnȇs egenonto, 351-2). ‘Yesterday they saw Cleonymus, the greatest
coward who threw away his shield; because of it they became deer’ (elaphoi dia tout’ egenonto, 353-4). –
Dover explains in his edition of The
Clouds: ‘elaphoi: Proverbislly
timid’ – ‘And now (kai nun g’), since
they have seen Cleisthenes (hoti
Kleisthenȇ eidon), you can see (horais),
because of it they became women (dia
tout’ egenonto gunaikes, 355).’ – Dover explains: ‘Kleisthenȇ: The stock effeminate of the Old Comedy.’
Obviously,
the female form in which the Chorus enters the stage is not the ‘immortal Form’
of the deity. To get a notion of it, we must look at what Socrates says about
them: ‘They are the great goddesses (megalai
theai) to men of leisure (andrasin
argois); they (haiper) give as (hȇmin parechousin) thought (gnȏmȇn), discussion (dialexin), and intellect (kai noun, 316-17)’.
I see Socrates’
view of ‘discussion’ dialexin as a
divine gift as particularly important. Firstly, because Parmenides insisted
that whoever denies the existence of Forms utterly destroys ‘the power of
discussion’ (tȇn tou dialegesthai dunamin);
secondly, because Socrates in Phaedrus
– which, in harmony with the ancient biographic tradition I view as Plato’s
first dialogue, written while Socrates was still alive (see The Lost Plato on my website) – says
that all souls that enter the human body must have seen the Forms before
entering it, ‘for man must understand (dei
gar anthrȏpon sunienai) that which is spoken according to Form (kat’ eidos legomenon), as it comes from
many sensations (ek pollȏn ion aisthȇseȏn)
gathered together into one by reason (eis
hen logismȏi sunairoumenon, 249b’.
This second
point gains on importance if we consider the version of the words of the Clouds
preserved by all the codices with the exception of the codex Ravennas: athanatais ideais epidȏmetha tȇleskopȏi
ommati gaian, which means ‘let us see the earth by means of immortal Forms
with the far-reaching eye’. The human souls in the Phaedrus can use speech and understand what is spoken only because
of their transcendental memory, that is memory they acquired by directly seeing
the Forms prior to entering the human Form, memory that is operative in every
speech act. According to this version of the Chorus’ words, Socrates’ Deity
views the things on earth directly by means of the immortal Forms.
Aristophanes
wrote two versions of The Clouds, and
the text we have is a combination of the two. I believe that both versions of
the lines 286-290, the Ravennas’ version and the version preserved by the other
codices, are authentic, each belonging to a different version of the play. For
each version of those lines highlights different aspects of Socrates’ Forms. (See
‘Introduction’ Ch. IX. ‘The two versions of the play’, in Dover’s edition of The Clouds, Oxford University Press
1968.)
No comments:
Post a Comment