Friday, January 31, 2025

3 On Hope, inspired by Barron Trump. On Trust, inspired by Ivanka Trump

What happened to the Kennys after they were escorted by the police from my flat? Barbara Day writes in The Velvet Philosophers: 'Anthony Kenny and his American-born wife were driven off to Bartolomějská (the police head quarters), where they were held until three in the morning and interrogated in separate rooms. The Kennys were delivered to the border-crossing with West Germany, and, carrying their luggage, walked through the woods of Rozvadov in the frosty dawn of an April morning. Tomin and  his students, [after being driven to Bartolomějská, one by one] remained locked up for something over the statutory 48 hours.' (Barbara Day, The Velvet Philosophers, The Claridge Press, 1999, p. 58)

The brutal way in which the Kennys were expelled from Czechoslovakia contrasts with Kenny's preparation for their visit: 'Part of the purpose of Anthony Kenny's visit to the Czechoslovak Embassy on March 19 had been to ask for clear guidelines as to what was and was not permitted to academic visitors to Czechoslovakia. Dr Kenny also needed to know on his on behalf, as he and his wife were due to leave for Prague in the second week of April.' (Barbara Day, p. 56)

Let us now view all this within a broader political framework. Roger Scruton wrote in 'A catacomb culture' (TLS February 16-22 , 1990): 

'Following the example  set by Kathleen Wilkes - an Oxford philosopher of intrepid character - academics began to visit their Czechoslovak colleagues, many of whom they met in the seminar 0rganized by Julius Tomin. The visiting continued for little more than a year, during which period many people, including the Master of Balliol College, were summarily expelled from Czechoslovakia. The publicity-conscious Tomin then emigrated and, so far as the Western press and the majority of Western academics were concerned, that was the end of the matter. However, a small sum of money had been given for the relief of our Czechoslovak colleagues... We decided that, although our purpose was charitable, and in violation of neither English nor Czechoslovak law, it should not be openly pursued, and that we could henceforth best help our Czechoslovak colleagues by working secretly.

We were able to set up a network of secret classes - not only in Bohemia, but also in Moravia and Slovakia. We began with philosophy. Soon, however, we were providing courses in as many subject as our Czechoslovak colleagues demanded: social and political thought, theology, history, Hebrew, literature, art, music and architectural theory. Many of our visitors were extremely well known in their own countries... Each would travel with books, tapes, and transcripts while, through independent channels, we would smuggle printing equipment, photocopiers, binding machines, and the countless other requirements of the "catacomb culture".

In the mid 1980s, thanks to a generous grant from George Soros (who will surely be commemorated in future years as a great Hungarian patriot, but also as one of the saviours of Central Europe), we had expanded into Moravia... Last summer, however, the organizer of our work in Slovakia, Ján Ćarnogurský, was arrested, charged with "subversion in collaboration with foreign powers", and subjected to months of interrogation. Yet, by a miracle, the judge defied his instructions and passed a verdict of innocent... Two weeks later Ćarnogurský was made Deputy Prime Minister... By then another of our beneficiaries was President, and within weeks we were to see our friends occupying the highest offices in the land.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

2 On Hope, inspired by Barron Trump. On Trust, inspired by Ivanka Trump

The last Oxford academic, who spoke in my philosophy seminar was Dr Anthony Kenny, the Master of Balliol College. I devoted to the event the 'Pursuit of Philosophy', published in History of Political Thought (Vol. V, No 3, Winter 1984). Let me quote: 'My discussion with Anthony Kenny on the right pursuit of philosophy took place in Prague in April 1980. At that time my philosophy seminar had been harassed by the Czech police, but we still managed to meet. The arrival of the Master of Balliol was anticipated with great expectations. Some expected a catastrophe which would definitely finish my seminar. I could not imagine the police interfering once Kenny was granted the visas. That is why I hoped for a breakthrough. If the police refrained from harassing us in this case they would hardly interfere on future occasions. My aspirations would have been fulfilled. Prague would have had a place where once a week young people could discuss philosophy. Our philosophy seminar would have been a step on the road towards society which would maintain the social and economic framework of socialism and would allow free development of individuals.

Kenny arrived at our department about half an hour before the actual beginning of the seminar. He said that in his talk he would concentrate on a passage from the Nicomachean Ethics and a passage from the Eudemian Ethics: 'Would you translate these two passages in Czech to your students at the beginning of our session?'

I was relieved when I saw the Nicomachean passage (10th book 1177a12-1177b5). In my text it was heavily underlined and marked by an exclamation mark. I began to sweat when I saw the lengthy passage in the Eudemian Ethics (1218b31-1219a39); I had never read the Eudemian Ethics. I excused myself and retired into the kitchen. I barely managed to read the passage once when my wife summoned me to open the seminar.

Kenny began by asking me to translate the two passages. I accepted the task, reading each passage sentence by sentence aloud in Greek before interpreting it in Czech. Kenny chose those two passages for he intended to talk about the pursuit of happiness in the Nicomachean and the Eudemian Ethics. He dealt with the problem in his recently published The Aristotelian Ethics (Oxford 1978), where he proved, against the dominant opinions of scholars, that the three books, which the Nicomachean and the Eudemian Ethics have in common, belonged originally to the Eudemian Ethics, which he viewed as genuinely Aristotle's, while the Nicomachean Ethics he saw as students' imitations. Let me quote from his book: 'A person who organised his life entirely with a view to the promotion of philosophical speculation would not be wise but cunning, not phronimos but panourgos. The type of person whom many regard as the hero of the Nicomachean Ethics turns out, by the standards of the Eudemian Ethics, to be a vicious and ignoble character.' (p. 214)

When Kenny got to this point, I had to exchange the role of an interpreter for that of a discussion partner: 'In the Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle puts forward reasons why philosophy is the accomplished source of good life. He points to its being most continuous and independent of external circumstances. It reminds me of Socrates who says in the Apology: 'As long as I live I will not stop doing philosophy.' Kenny did not oppose the 'Socratic' interpretation, but asked: 'wouldn't you consider Plato a much better philosopher than Socrates?' I replied: 'How can I accept that Plato was a better philosopher when he is full of Socrates?' - At this point dozens of policemen stormed into the room.

1 On Hope, inspired by Barron Trump. On Trust, inspired by Ivanka Trump

 I am 86, I wake up several times during the night. Two days ago I woke up around midnight; I turned on my computer, googled the YouTube, and there I found 'Barron Trump Speech Shocks the Entire World at His Father's Inauguration'; Barron was 10 years old. I listened: 'Today is a day of celebration, a day of change, a day of hope, a day of reflection, never losing the sight of future we are building together.'

Hope thus described can be very powerful. I experienced this kind of hope when I was somewhat younger than ten years old Barron. Born in December 1938, in July 1943 I was 5 years old, and I remember my aunt running downstairs and shouting with glee 'Mussolini was overthrown'; we celebrated that event. And of course, we celebrated the final capitulation of Germany in May 1945, our liberation. But in 1948, when I was 10, our hopes of going to live in freedom were crushed: the Communists took power, which they held until 1989.

Our hopes revived in the Spring 1968, when we attempted to reform the communist system, creating 'Socialism with Human Face'. This hope was crushed by the Soviet Red Army in August 1968.

In 1977 I opened a philosophy seminar for young people who were, like my son Lukas, barred from any form of higher education because of their parents' involvement in Prague Spring 1968. In May 1978 I invited Oxford Academics to our seminar: 'We live in Czechoslovakia, I and my friends and students. A year ago we decided not to respect any more the current illegal practice of state functionaries, who arrogate the right to decide who may study and what, who may teach and what he may teach. We decided to study philosophy together... In view of the fact that I do not get post and my telephone may be confiscated any day [my telephone was confiscated a few days after I sent the invitation to Oxford Academics] we cannot rely on normal means of communication. Allow me to make a suggestion which seems to be most practicable. We study philosophy together every Wednesday, from September to June, always at 6pm in my flat: Prague 7, Keramická 3. Whenever you come, you will be welcome. Dear friends, you will make us happy if you answer our request for cooperation and we are looking forward to having you with us.'

Friday, January 10, 2025

3 My correspondence with Octopus - clever octopus

The preceding entry on My correspondence with Octopus illustrates octopus' claim that they 'continually review my account balance and monthly payments to help keep my account on track'. I intended to send a photocopy of it to the Heads of the Departments at Charles University in Prague. I photocopied the piece; when I printed it, I've got the following:

'2  My correspondence with Octopus

January 2025:

Important: Let's get your monthly payments right."

my electricity supplier. 

of Money Expert informing me that they made the switch, as requested.

Thank you for using MoneyExpert powered by SimplySwitch to switch your Gas &

But back to octopus. In their letter of the beginning of January 2025 - their letter is

"We continually review your account balance and monthly payments to help keep your

We recommend monthly payments of £350.69. This includes:

* £69.11 per month until January 2026 to get your balance to a healthy position"

any notice of the fact that as of December 2nd 2024 I stopped having my daily baths in 7am, i.e. to the time when using electricity is cheaper).'

Needless to say, I cannot send this eviscerated version to the Heads of the Departments at Charles University.

Clever Octopus.

2 My correspondence with Octopus

Disregarding my email of December 2nd, octopus wrote to me at the beginning of January 2025:

"Hi,

Important: Let's get your monthly payments right."

Clearly, octopus took no notice of my email in which I informed them that I had changed my electricity supplier. 

More disturbingly, my change of electricity supplier did not take place, and that in spite of Money Expert informing me that they made the switch, as requested.

MoneyExpert emailed me on December 4, 2024: 'Dear Julius Tomin,

Thank you for using MoneyExpert powered by SimplySwitch to switch your Gas & Electricity.'

But back to octopus. In their letter of the beginning of January 2025 - their letter is undated - they write:

"We continually review your account balance and monthly payments to help keep your account on track.

We recommend monthly payments of £350.69. This includes:

* £281.58 per month to cover your future energy costs

* £69.11 per month until January 2026 to get your balance to a healthy position"

Obviously, in their 'continually reviewing my account balance' octopus have not taken any notice of the fact that as of December 2nd 2024 I stopped having my daily baths in day time, turning all electricity demanding activities to night time (from midnight to 7am, i.e. to the time when using electricity is cheaper).

In the meantime, my use of electricity use changed even further. I had a fall, badly injuring my right hand wrist, so that I can't use the bath tub.